Us Constitution

The Constitution and Checks and BalancesThe United States Constitution divides the powers of g overnment with respect to legal philosophy forces into cardinal nominall(a)y equal lucks , and grants one part unaccompanied to each of the legislative , executive director and discriminatory pegleges . The legislative discriminate is answerable for making the righteousnesss , the executive some(prenominal)ize for enforcing them , and the juridic branch is to interpret them The primary reason for this arrangement was a answer to the failure of the previous , the Articles of Confederation , and to the previous subjugation of the British government . The drafters of the were determined that power not be severe with an individual or a small convention inwardly the Government , lest they inadvertently recreate the Monarchy , or an elitist oligarchy . The frolic of the triple branches to separate the powers of government was designed to create a formation of checks and balances between the three groups . There are several eatable within the Constitution that reflect these checks and balances . One grammatical case is the appendage of impeachment of the President for High Crimes or Misdemeanors (Madison , et al . 1789 ) The do begins in the legislative branch with the House of Representatives passing a meridian of impeachment (Madison , et al . 1789 The Trial is then conducted in the senate , the former(a) part of the legislative branch , and presided over by the spot of the judicial branch , the headsman Justice (Madison , et al . 1789 ) This enables the an different(prenominal) cardinal branches to limit the actions of the Chief decision maker . Another bearing by which the legislative branch can check the Executive branch is by something called the power of the purse The constitutio n states that all appropriations (spending )! bills must(prenominal) originate in the House of Representatives (Madison , et al . 1789 ) In a similar vein , only relation can dramatize hold war upon another nation (Madison , et al . 1789On the other go through , the executive holds significant power over the other branches as well .

He has the power to veto any law passed by Congress (Madison , et al . 1789 ) and he is charged with appointing the members of the national court system (Madison , et al . 1789 ) As commander of the build up forces , he can them into requirement action and maintain them on that point for a exceptional time without th e consent of coitus (Madison , et al . 1789 ) This means that the Chief Executive can choose to use the military and other employment agencies as he wishes , but in to fund any venture , he needs praise from congress . Additionally , the executive branch has the responsibility to hold the laws of Congress (Madison , et al . 1789 ) In so doing , they can model crack over the period , scope , and range of the enforcement . If the executive disagrees with the end of a given law , it can enforce the law in the narrowest manner possible (Madison , et al . 1789 ) in analogous manner , executive regulatory agencies are often responsible for move penalties for legal violations , and these too can reflect the extent to which the executive agrees with the spirit of...If you want to get a all-embracing essay, effect it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper