Iraq War Essay Example for Free

Iraq War EssayThe the Statesn establishment took the polemic closing of waging a fight against Iraq. The circumstances and the motives of the American government indicate that the fight on Iraq was unused and can non be justified although the American government has put for fightd a few reasons for waging this war. The logic and deduction does non support such contentions by the American government. The American government has failed to justify its unilateral finality of declaring war against Iraq.In the year 2002, the American President revealed his forge of attacking the Iraqi regime as it was thought that Iraq was in the process of emerging as the greatest threat to the American credentials. This decision was seemingly taken on the basis of the intelligence information that the US government die harded concerning Iraqs nuclear program. However, it is interest to note that this intelligence information was kept secret until 2002. The major reason for this war was the terrorist attack of the orb Trade Center in the year 2001.Obviously, this attack had left(p) Americans at a state of transgress as the successful terrorist attack demonstrated to the whole origination that American security is at spot and that American military and intelligence power is not that efficient. (Powers 1) The knee jerk reaction resulted in the decision to chalk out the proper plans to pr even upt the future attacks of the American territory. However, it is interesting to note that the American government could not obtain even the simple absolute majority of the members of the UN Security Council.This clearly indicates that the United Nations did not wholeheartedly support the Iraqi venture initiated by the American government. The close allies such as France and Germany could not be convinced of the require for this war project as these countries felt that there was no need for any fresh attack on the Iraqi territory as after 1991 this region was left in almos t ejectd state. The President was able to only convince the United States Congress as the members of the Congress did not question the necessity of a war on Iraq.The Congress members did not even participate in the debate regarding the Iraqi war. This shows that the American government could not convince the world leadership that Iraq was up to some fresh mischief in the form of the production of armaments having the capacity to destroy the world population. These details indicate that the American government has been alienated by other important powers which have not accepted the evidence presented by America that Iraq was emerging as another center of terrorist activities.(Powers 2) The main cause of the proponents of war was that Saddam ibn Talal Hussein possessed various dangerous machines such as nuclear arsenals and chemical substance weapons which could have been used to destroy the enemy countries. The proponents of war asserted that the past history of Saddam showed tha t he was an aggressor. Their another contention is that Saddam Hussein had connections with the Moslem terrorist organizations and the leaders such as Osama bin cockeyed who had played an important role in the WTC attack.(Mearsheimer and Walt 1) These argon the three reasons given by war supporters to justify the US aggression on Iraq. However, the proponents of war are not able to prove that Hussein really possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD). The UN inspections did not reveal that Iraq actually possessed or had the say-so of building huge base of WMD which could have been used for destructive purposes. The War mongers were aware of the event that their action would lead to huge expenses to the American treasury and that this war would result in the alienation of America in the world government activity.Even then they insisted that war was inevitable as one could not commit to ignore the possession of nuclear arsenals in the hands of the Iraqi leadership. In reality, t he US had the power to turn back the alleged Iraqi aggression. The argument that war was inevitable rests on the faulty logic. The war supporters are not able to come up with substantial proof to educe that Saddam had seriously pursued the plan of destroying his enemy countries. (Mearsheimer and Walt 4)However, in this context one should remember that after the Gulf war the allied forces had obtained doorway into Iraq and they had used their energy to reduce the military power of Iraq. The Gulf war debacle was sufficient to deplete the Iraqi resources. Perhaps the American government needed to make a strong statement against Islamic terrorists after the September 11 attack. This resulted in the declaration of war on Iraq. This can be considered as the face saving attempt make by the American government.The newspapers have reported information from CIA documents which contradicted the statements made by the President Bush who asserted that Iraq was trying to produce nuclear arsena ls as the Iraqi officials had approached conspiracy Africa to obtain materials needed for producing nuclear weapons. However, CIA expressed doubt regarding this report that Iraq was trying to obtain nuclear weapon materials from federation Africa. Another contention of the President was that the Iraqi officials refused entry of the weapon inspectors into Iraqi regions. However, there are evidences which refute this allegation.In reality, as the newspapers reported, the Iraqi government had offered their cooperation with the weapon inspectors. thither is also evidence to suggest that even before the beginning of war the American government obtained the information that Iraq did not approach South Africa to obtain nuclear weapon materials. This shows that the Bush administration had deliberately misinterpreted the intelligence reports in order to obtain the support of the Congress members for this war. In spite of these contradictions Bush has defended his action of invading Iraq wi thout any major reason. (Priest and Milbank A01)There are evidences to state that the US decision to attack Iraq has backfired and it has not contributed to the improvement of the US image in the international political arena. The Iraq venture has resulted in the protest by the governments and people belonging to different nations in the world which did not find any necessity for this war. (Martin 3) The main reason for this protest against the war is that this war was unjust. The extreme action taken by the US forces against the innocent Iraqi civilians has come under general criticism. This shows the world public opinion has not supported the idea of the US led campaign against Iraq.This war has enraged the Muslim nations and this may contribute to increase in the activities of the Muslim terrorist organizations leading to the loss of lives in different parts of the world. There is no evidence to state that the US government obtained the support of the majority of the Americans f or this war. The Iraq war has contributed to the creation negative image of Bush not only in the world politics but also in the US. In this sense, this war has not benefited the US people. Instead of increasing the security of Americans, this war has increased the possibility of terrorist attack on the innocent American population. (Martin 4)Works CitedBracknell, Major Rob. Euro-bashing as Good Sport. Naval War College Review. 58. 2, (2005) 139-142. Available at https//www.brookings.edu/